Best Known (29, 29+27, s)-Nets in Base 8
(29, 29+27, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 56, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 28, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
(29, 29+27, 162)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (29, 56, 162)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 28, 81)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 80)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 80)-sequence over F64, using
(29, 29+27, 5351)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 56, 5352)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 55, 5352)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 46 879407 754132 906531 431633 677655 244825 508664 868164 > 855 [i]