Best Known (43, 43+28, s)-Nets in Base 8
(43, 43+28, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 71, 354)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (43, 72, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 36, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 36, 177)-net over F64, using
(43, 43+28, 384)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (43, 71, 384)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(871, 384, F8, 28) (dual of [384, 313, 29]-code), using
- 59 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 10 times 0, 1, 21 times 0, 1, 25 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(868, 322, F8, 28) (dual of [322, 254, 29]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(6434, 161, F64, 28) (dual of [161, 127, 29]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,132P) [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 161, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(6434, 161, F64, 28) (dual of [161, 127, 29]-code), using
- 59 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 10 times 0, 1, 21 times 0, 1, 25 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(868, 322, F8, 28) (dual of [322, 254, 29]-code), using
(43, 43+28, 32824)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 71, 32825)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 13164 507094 941679 632588 564248 055666 524228 966662 577316 639501 851416 > 871 [i]