Best Known (83−29, 83, s)-Nets in Base 8
(83−29, 83, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 83, 354)-net over F8, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 94, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 47, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 47, 177)-net over F64, using
(83−29, 83, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(54, 83, 516)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (54, 84, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (33, 63, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (33, 64, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 32, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 32, 258)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (33, 64, 516)-net over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (33, 63, 516)-net over F16, using
(83−29, 83, 781)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (54, 83, 781)-net over F8, using
(83−29, 83, 168215)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 83, 168216)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (54, 82, 168216)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 113 087251 607537 824527 998220 191188 288853 379905 086530 980117 347302 223915 466502 > 882 [i]