Best Known (94−29, 94, s)-Nets in Base 8
(94−29, 94, 389)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 94, 389)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 22, 35)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 34)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F8 with g(F) = 7, N(F) = 34, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 34, using a function field by Sémirat [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 34)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (43, 72, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 36, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 36, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (8, 22, 35)-net over F8, using
(94−29, 94, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(65, 94, 576)-net in base 8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (65, 98, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 49, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 42, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 42, 288)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 49, 288)-net in base 64, using
(94−29, 94, 1751)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (65, 94, 1751)-net over F8, using
(94−29, 94, 861892)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 94, 861893)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (65, 93, 861893)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 971339 655421 649319 565626 937784 674030 315109 173352 285655 465748 091223 747411 753625 307168 > 893 [i]