Best Known (51, 51+29, s)-Nets in Base 8
(51, 51+29, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 80, 354)-net over F8, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 88, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 44, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 44, 177)-net over F64, using
(51, 51+29, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(51, 80, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (31, 60, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 30, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 30, 258)-net over F256, using
(51, 51+29, 628)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (51, 80, 628)-net over F8, using
(51, 51+29, 107729)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 80, 107730)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (51, 79, 107730)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 220880 380875 193575 477766 955546 375575 724667 178598 451081 880549 448842 560904 > 879 [i]