Best Known (55, 55+30, s)-Nets in Base 8
(55, 55+30, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (55, 85, 354)-net over F8, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (55, 96, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 48, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 48, 177)-net over F64, using
(55, 55+30, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(55, 85, 516)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (55, 86, 516)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (12, 43, 258)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (12, 44, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 33, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 33, 258)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (12, 44, 258)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (12, 43, 258)-net in base 64, using
(55, 55+30, 754)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (55, 85, 754)-net over F8, using
(55, 55+30, 120266)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (55, 85, 120267)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 57897 973173 744467 358319 289727 068911 536204 691840 250626 496431 058094 647265 369920 > 885 [i]