Best Known (71−31, 71, s)-Nets in Base 8
(71−31, 71, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 71, 208)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (40, 74, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 37, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 37, 104)-net over F64, using
(71−31, 71, 258)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (40, 71, 258)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (40, 72, 258)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 36, 129)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 36, 129)-net over F64, using
(71−31, 71, 15025)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 71, 15026)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 70, 15026)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1646 582935 241223 443358 683943 090756 325399 301315 226441 484334 641992 > 870 [i]