Best Known (91−32, 91, s)-Nets in Base 8
(91−32, 91, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (59, 91, 354)-net over F8, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (59, 104, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 52, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 52, 177)-net over F64, using
(91−32, 91, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(59, 91, 516)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (59, 92, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (36, 69, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (36, 70, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 35, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 35, 258)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (36, 70, 516)-net over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (36, 69, 516)-net over F16, using
(91−32, 91, 810)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (59, 91, 810)-net over F8, using
(91−32, 91, 132963)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (59, 91, 132964)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 15177 686032 905333 238523 544991 224540 030428 274956 723064 625024 594118 476759 922457 743394 > 891 [i]