Best Known (56, 56+32, s)-Nets in Base 8
(56, 56+32, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (56, 88, 354)-net over F8, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (56, 98, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 49, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 49, 177)-net over F64, using
(56, 56+32, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(56, 88, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (34, 66, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 33, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 33, 258)-net over F256, using
(56, 56+32, 665)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (56, 88, 665)-net over F8, using
(56, 56+32, 90030)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (56, 88, 90031)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 29 646773 674458 800281 858357 456944 557284 249028 540450 860896 986961 175068 819546 863778 > 888 [i]