Best Known (58, 58+32, s)-Nets in Base 8
(58, 58+32, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (58, 90, 354)-net over F8, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (58, 102, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 51, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 51, 177)-net over F64, using
(58, 58+32, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(58, 90, 516)-net in base 8, using
- 82 times duplication [i] based on (56, 88, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (34, 66, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 33, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 33, 258)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (34, 66, 516)-net over F16, using
(58, 58+32, 758)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (58, 90, 758)-net over F8, using
(58, 58+32, 116757)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (58, 90, 116758)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1897 220226 740942 957711 083304 313612 202217 994291 178353 057114 882546 824900 900753 562237 > 890 [i]