Best Known (60, 60+32, s)-Nets in Base 8
(60, 60+32, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (60, 92, 354)-net over F8, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (60, 106, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 53, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 53, 177)-net over F64, using
(60, 60+32, 518)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(60, 92, 518)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (37, 69, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (37, 70, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 35, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 35, 259)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (37, 70, 518)-net over F16, using
(60, 60+32, 865)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (60, 92, 865)-net over F8, using
(60, 60+32, 151418)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (60, 92, 151419)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 121418 279432 671338 765055 945043 421163 368179 090084 174949 221152 915687 207457 101474 843445 > 892 [i]