Best Known (89, 89+32, s)-Nets in Base 8
(89, 89+32, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (89, 121, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (89, 122, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 61, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 61, 513)-net over F64, using
(89, 89+32, 5957)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (89, 121, 5957)-net over F8, using
(89, 89+32, 6562329)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (89, 121, 6562330)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 18 788342 300343 912463 910164 161679 660324 362680 710180 772297 628783 097970 629817 973461 073557 289655 179795 034437 237247 > 8121 [i]