Best Known (75−33, 75, s)-Nets in Base 8
(75−33, 75, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (42, 75, 208)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 78, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 39, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 39, 104)-net over F64, using
(75−33, 75, 258)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (42, 75, 258)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 76, 258)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 38, 129)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 38, 129)-net over F64, using
(75−33, 75, 14586)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (42, 75, 14587)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (42, 74, 14587)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 6 746270 968647 377629 348625 370360 773282 074484 998388 855282 053167 658765 > 874 [i]