Best Known (106, 106+33, s)-Nets in Base 8
(106, 106+33, 1040)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (106, 139, 1040)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 17, 14)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 13)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 13)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (89, 122, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 61, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 61, 513)-net over F64, using
- digital (1, 17, 14)-net over F8, using
(106, 106+33, 15312)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (106, 139, 15312)-net over F8, using
(106, 106+33, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (106, 139, large)-net in base 8, because
- 31 times m-reduction [i] would yield (106, 108, large)-net in base 8, but