Best Known (94−34, 94, s)-Nets in Base 8
(94−34, 94, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (60, 94, 354)-net over F8, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (60, 106, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 53, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 53, 177)-net over F64, using
(94−34, 94, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(60, 94, 516)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (13, 47, 258)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (13, 48, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 36, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 36, 258)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (13, 48, 258)-net in base 64, using
(94−34, 94, 719)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (60, 94, 719)-net over F8, using
(94−34, 94, 101008)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (60, 94, 101009)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 7 771083 377042 045706 995087 833012 101582 544312 942445 552752 336048 243090 356411 594376 723912 > 894 [i]