Best Known (5, 5+34, s)-Nets in Base 8
(5, 5+34, 28)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (5, 39, 28)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 27)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
(5, 5+34, 29)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (5, 39, 29)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 28)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 29, using
(5, 5+34, 67)-Net over F8 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (5, 39, 68)-net over F8, because
- 2 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (5, 37, 68)-net over F8, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(837, 68, F8, 32) (dual of [68, 31, 33]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(85, 35, S8, 4), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1 306624 / 39 > 85 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(85, 35, S8, 4), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(837, 68, F8, 32) (dual of [68, 31, 33]-code), but
(5, 5+34, 82)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (5, 39, 83)-net in base 8, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(839, 83, S8, 34), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 45 634012 001041 176921 080871 938056 479824 833320 287034 817933 172541 489152 / 265 829351 035282 206850 599564 523879 > 839 [i]