Best Known (95, 95+34, s)-Nets in Base 8
(95, 95+34, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 129, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (95, 134, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 67, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 67, 513)-net over F64, using
(95, 95+34, 6392)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (95, 129, 6392)-net over F8, using
(95, 95+34, 7306440)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 129, 7306441)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 315 216317 834186 859388 655053 485338 702478 261102 592557 107199 648910 436448 937366 430846 755492 073375 717080 316834 726342 818240 > 8129 [i]