Best Known (75−35, 75, s)-Nets in Base 8
(75−35, 75, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 75, 160)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (40, 78, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 39, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 39, 80)-net over F64, using
(75−35, 75, 194)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (40, 75, 194)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (40, 76, 194)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 38, 97)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 97, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 38, 97)-net over F64, using
(75−35, 75, 8738)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 75, 8739)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 74, 8739)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 6 749158 043173 365425 344411 853860 345933 693461 480394 128769 429744 882692 > 874 [i]