Best Known (62, 62+35, s)-Nets in Base 8
(62, 62+35, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (62, 97, 354)-net over F8, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (62, 110, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 55, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 55, 177)-net over F64, using
(62, 62+35, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(62, 97, 516)-net in base 8, using
- 81 times duplication [i] based on (61, 96, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (37, 72, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 36, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 36, 258)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (37, 72, 516)-net over F16, using
(62, 62+35, 746)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (62, 97, 746)-net over F8, using
(62, 62+35, 129007)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (62, 97, 129008)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (62, 96, 129008)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 497 368028 565363 271643 871870 718943 289806 622155 031602 054106 318445 378755 894206 379877 032742 > 896 [i]