Best Known (152−36, 152, s)-Nets in Base 8
(152−36, 152, 1054)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (116, 152, 1054)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (116, 153, 1054)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 23, 28)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 27)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 27)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (93, 130, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 65, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 65, 513)-net over F64, using
- digital (5, 23, 28)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(152−36, 152, 16619)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (116, 152, 16619)-net over F8, using
(152−36, 152, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (116, 152, large)-net in base 8, because
- 34 times m-reduction [i] would yield (116, 118, large)-net in base 8, but