Best Known (64, 64+36, s)-Nets in Base 8
(64, 64+36, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 100, 354)-net over F8, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (64, 114, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 57, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 57, 177)-net over F64, using
(64, 64+36, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(64, 100, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (39, 75, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (39, 76, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 38, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 38, 258)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (39, 76, 516)-net over F16, using
(64, 64+36, 773)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (64, 100, 773)-net over F8, using
(64, 64+36, 112242)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 100, 112243)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 2 037330 594859 744773 109626 262844 480703 628690 047765 212818 643541 532776 314499 909449 116073 945275 > 8100 [i]