Best Known (66, 66+36, s)-Nets in Base 8
(66, 66+36, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (66, 102, 354)-net over F8, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (66, 118, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 59, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 59, 177)-net over F64, using
(66, 66+36, 518)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(66, 102, 518)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (15, 51, 259)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 52, 259)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 39, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 39, 259)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 52, 259)-net in base 64, using
(66, 66+36, 869)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (66, 102, 869)-net over F8, using
(66, 66+36, 141419)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (66, 102, 141420)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 130 385906 532672 934453 199205 487841 870182 971442 952153 388839 361433 026869 903062 434246 382070 623930 > 8102 [i]