Best Known (44, 44+37, s)-Nets in Base 8
(44, 44+37, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (44, 81, 208)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (44, 82, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 41, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 41, 104)-net over F64, using
(44, 44+37, 226)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (44, 81, 226)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (44, 82, 226)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 41, 113)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 112)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 113, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 112)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 41, 113)-net over F64, using
(44, 44+37, 11125)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (44, 81, 11126)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (44, 80, 11126)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1 767255 611735 439714 779330 020931 101167 978266 318289 579208 982378 161846 988134 > 880 [i]