Best Known (68, 68+38, s)-Nets in Base 8
(68, 68+38, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (68, 106, 354)-net over F8, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (68, 122, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 61, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 61, 177)-net over F64, using
(68, 68+38, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(68, 106, 516)-net in base 8, using
- 82 times duplication [i] based on (66, 104, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 78, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 39, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 39, 258)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 78, 516)-net over F16, using
(68, 68+38, 828)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (68, 106, 828)-net over F8, using
(68, 68+38, 123699)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (68, 106, 123700)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 534040 004607 187876 908122 053309 514797 930352 327599 860714 919130 312865 363213 282993 709880 928787 606321 > 8106 [i]