Best Known (70, 70+39, s)-Nets in Base 8
(70, 70+39, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (70, 109, 354)-net over F8, using
- 17 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (70, 126, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 63, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 63, 177)-net over F64, using
(70, 70+39, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(70, 109, 516)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (70, 110, 516)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (15, 55, 258)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 56, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 42, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 42, 258)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 56, 258)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (15, 55, 258)-net in base 64, using
(70, 70+39, 855)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (70, 109, 855)-net over F8, using
(70, 70+39, 153970)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (70, 109, 153971)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (70, 108, 153971)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 34 177128 286442 754568 499348 191734 462259 065000 209361 527340 702433 269883 265201 868566 692125 937952 717736 > 8108 [i]