Best Known (130, 130+40, s)-Nets in Base 8
(130, 130+40, 1091)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (130, 170, 1091)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (14, 34, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (96, 136, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 68, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 68, 513)-net over F64, using
- digital (14, 34, 65)-net over F8, using
(130, 130+40, 19025)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (130, 170, 19025)-net over F8, using
(130, 130+40, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (130, 170, large)-net in base 8, because
- 38 times m-reduction [i] would yield (130, 132, large)-net in base 8, but