Best Known (99, 99+41, s)-Nets in Base 8
(99, 99+41, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (99, 140, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (99, 142, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 71, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 71, 513)-net over F64, using
(99, 99+41, 3282)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (99, 140, 3282)-net over F8, using
(99, 99+41, 2242235)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (99, 140, 2242236)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (99, 139, 2242236)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 338462 433829 606257 743326 016047 176965 435319 072725 281367 912292 449699 483296 138613 728552 096996 664230 566953 468959 085139 185520 874954 > 8139 [i]