Best Known (126, 126+43, s)-Nets in Base 8
(126, 126+43, 1054)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (126, 169, 1054)-net over F8, using
- 81 times duplication [i] based on digital (125, 168, 1054)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 26, 28)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 27)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 27)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (99, 142, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 71, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 71, 513)-net over F64, using
- digital (5, 26, 28)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(126, 126+43, 10173)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (126, 169, 10173)-net over F8, using
(126, 126+43, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (126, 169, large)-net in base 8, because
- 41 times m-reduction [i] would yield (126, 128, large)-net in base 8, but