Best Known (100−44, 100, s)-Nets in Base 8
(100−44, 100, 256)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (56, 100, 256)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (56, 102, 256)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 51, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 51, 128)-net over F64, using
(100−44, 100, 322)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (56, 100, 322)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 50, 161)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 160)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 161, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 160)-sequence over F64, using
(100−44, 100, 16456)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (56, 100, 16457)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 2 037137 560933 364475 457843 121477 567863 218889 483490 097791 184817 570801 328670 969660 482933 733072 > 8100 [i]