Best Known (125, 125+44, s)-Nets in Base 8
(125, 125+44, 1050)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (125, 169, 1050)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 25, 24)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 23)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- the Klein quartic over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 23)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (100, 144, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 72, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 72, 513)-net over F64, using
- digital (3, 25, 24)-net over F8, using
(125, 125+44, 8567)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (125, 169, 8567)-net over F8, using
(125, 125+44, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (125, 169, large)-net in base 8, because
- 42 times m-reduction [i] would yield (125, 127, large)-net in base 8, but