Best Known (104, 104+45, s)-Nets in Base 8
(104, 104+45, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (104, 149, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (104, 152, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 76, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 76, 513)-net over F64, using
(104, 104+45, 2840)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (104, 149, 2840)-net over F8, using
(104, 104+45, 1538451)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (104, 149, 1538452)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (104, 148, 1538452)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 45 427823 677352 357225 398141 140672 426780 991648 840183 162787 152064 850259 610626 019682 321715 371140 425249 661015 670542 983362 358648 739312 117536 > 8148 [i]