Best Known (126, 126+45, s)-Nets in Base 8
(126, 126+45, 1050)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (126, 171, 1050)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 25, 24)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 23)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- the Klein quartic over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 23)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (101, 146, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 73, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 73, 513)-net over F64, using
- digital (3, 25, 24)-net over F8, using
(126, 126+45, 7994)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (126, 171, 7994)-net over F8, using
(126, 126+45, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (126, 171, large)-net in base 8, because
- 43 times m-reduction [i] would yield (126, 128, large)-net in base 8, but