Best Known (132−48, 132, s)-Nets in Base 8
(132−48, 132, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (84, 132, 354)-net over F8, using
- 22 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (84, 154, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 77, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 77, 177)-net over F64, using
(132−48, 132, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(84, 132, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (51, 99, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 100, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 50, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 50, 258)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 100, 516)-net over F16, using
(132−48, 132, 926)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (84, 132, 926)-net over F8, using
(132−48, 132, 129780)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (84, 132, 129781)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 161403 490229 605209 667555 886055 964895 717170 519423 685094 485254 674287 269817 295861 894834 290250 982999 794905 478773 953044 007372 > 8132 [i]