Best Known (45, 45+49, s)-Nets in Base 8
(45, 45+49, 99)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (45, 94, 99)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 31, 34)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 33)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 33)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 63, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (7, 31, 34)-net over F8, using
(45, 45+49, 144)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (45, 94, 144)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
(45, 45+49, 4408)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (45, 94, 4409)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (45, 93, 4409)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 975001 161498 367003 825188 376475 584178 400966 790196 882014 870194 265924 677960 459679 387531 > 893 [i]