Best Known (35−5, 35, s)-Nets in Base 8
(35−5, 35, 8388602)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 35, 8388602)-net over F8, using
- 81 times duplication [i] based on digital (29, 34, 8388602)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (12, 17, 4194301)-net over F64, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6417, 4194301, F64, 5, 5) (dual of [(4194301, 5), 20971488, 6]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(6417, large, F64, 5) (dual of [large, large−17, 6]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777217 | 648−1, defining interval I = [0,2], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−2,−1,0,1,2}|+1 = 6 (BCH-bound) [i]
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(6417, large, F64, 5) (dual of [large, large−17, 6]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6417, 4194301, F64, 5, 5) (dual of [(4194301, 5), 20971488, 6]-NRT-code), using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (12, 17, 4194301)-net over F64, using
(35−5, 35, large)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (30, 35, large)-net over F8, using
- 82 times duplication [i] based on digital (28, 33, large)-net over F8, using
(35−5, 35, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 35, large)-net in base 8, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 32, large)-net in base 8, but