Best Known (9−5, 9, s)-Nets in Base 8
(9−5, 9, 65)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (4, 9, 65)-net over F8, using
- base reduction for projective spaces (embedding PG(4,64) in PG(8,8)) for nets [i] based on digital (0, 5, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
(9−5, 9, 66)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (4, 9, 66)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(89, 66, F8, 5) (dual of [66, 57, 6]-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OA(82, 9, F8, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(7,8) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,8) [i]
- linear OA(87, 57, F8, 5) (dual of [57, 50, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(82, 9, F8, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(9−5, 9, 826)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (4, 9, 827)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (4, 8, 827)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 16 788101 > 88 [i]