Best Known (53, 53+5, s)-Nets in Base 8
(53, 53+5, large)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (53, 58, large)-net over F8, using
- 82 times duplication [i] based on digital (51, 56, large)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 56, large)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 28, 5592401)-net over F64, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6428, 5592401, F64, 9, 6) (dual of [(5592401, 9), 50331581, 7]-NRT-code), using
- OOA stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(6428, 5592402, F64, 3, 6) (dual of [(5592402, 3), 16777178, 7]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(647, large, F64, 3, 3), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(647, large, F64, 2, 3), using
- OAs with strength 3, b ≠ 2, and m > 3 are always embeddable [i] based on linear OA(647, large, F64, 3) (dual of [large, large−7, 4]-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(647, large, F64, 2, 3), using
- linear OOA(6421, 2796201, F64, 3, 6) (dual of [(2796201, 3), 8388582, 7]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 3-folding [i] based on linear OA(6421, large, F64, 6) (dual of [large, large−21, 7]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 644−1, defining interval I = [0,5], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 7 [i]
- OOA 3-folding [i] based on linear OA(6421, large, F64, 6) (dual of [large, large−21, 7]-code), using
- linear OOA(647, large, F64, 3, 3), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- OOA stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(6428, 5592402, F64, 3, 6) (dual of [(5592402, 3), 16777178, 7]-NRT-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6428, 5592401, F64, 9, 6) (dual of [(5592401, 9), 50331581, 7]-NRT-code), using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (22, 28, 5592401)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 56, large)-net over F8, using
(53, 53+5, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (53, 58, large)-net in base 8, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield (53, 55, large)-net in base 8, but