Best Known (110, 110+51, s)-Nets in Base 8
(110, 110+51, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (110, 161, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (110, 164, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 82, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 82, 513)-net over F64, using
(110, 110+51, 2277)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (110, 161, 2277)-net over F8, using
(110, 110+51, 875580)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (110, 161, 875581)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (110, 160, 875581)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 121811 159813 019967 535329 227679 733092 971400 158200 617567 220875 246775 018540 827210 611351 412155 918633 536232 256732 973388 682914 753495 649261 779660 159044 > 8160 [i]