Best Known (138−52, 138, s)-Nets in Base 8
(138−52, 138, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 138, 354)-net over F8, using
- 20 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (86, 158, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 79, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 79, 177)-net over F64, using
(138−52, 138, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(86, 138, 432)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (85, 138, 432)-net in base 8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (85, 140, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (15, 70, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 60, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 60, 216)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (15, 70, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (85, 140, 432)-net in base 8, using
(138−52, 138, 802)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (86, 138, 802)-net over F8, using
(138−52, 138, 93636)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 138, 93637)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 42317 478555 578216 613611 479253 265927 142111 151911 900166 716939 037261 247624 304019 359320 632461 026669 996145 010319 749685 897542 700880 > 8138 [i]