Best Known (117, 117+52, s)-Nets in Base 8
(117, 117+52, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (117, 169, 1026)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (114, 169, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
(117, 117+52, 2814)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (117, 169, 2814)-net over F8, using
(117, 117+52, 1117567)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (117, 169, 1117568)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 419 002623 008528 229023 741276 227823 418608 691243 323682 821698 102777 924355 828646 581151 230489 708281 072432 740111 676506 121849 167261 200796 424474 234528 924234 408009 > 8169 [i]