Best Known (164−53, 164, s)-Nets in Base 8
(164−53, 164, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (111, 164, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (111, 166, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 83, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 83, 513)-net over F64, using
(164−53, 164, 2063)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (111, 164, 2063)-net over F8, using
(164−53, 164, 691614)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (111, 164, 691615)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (111, 163, 691615)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1598 340231 294150 078928 972709 977375 144706 951011 418495 589567 196747 292140 154690 741334 019212 986273 720630 917410 085156 950164 041845 837645 320723 474323 835381 > 8163 [i]