Best Known (112, 112+53, s)-Nets in Base 8
(112, 112+53, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (112, 165, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (112, 168, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 84, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 84, 513)-net over F64, using
(112, 112+53, 2146)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (112, 165, 2146)-net over F8, using
(112, 112+53, 749202)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (112, 165, 749203)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (112, 164, 749203)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 12786 791535 541898 244160 812108 400240 348021 819192 775485 097808 891228 075150 331676 751016 223897 581421 811264 397408 798759 793543 993515 492826 654231 153420 199568 > 8164 [i]