Best Known (169−54, 169, s)-Nets in Base 8
(169−54, 169, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (115, 169, 1026)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (114, 169, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
(169−54, 169, 2257)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (115, 169, 2257)-net over F8, using
(169−54, 169, 701411)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (115, 169, 701412)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 419 007957 273282 709033 376918 552023 548444 683332 823205 559010 833516 670583 866844 268970 462564 474121 432066 726139 532993 295919 424922 328730 059281 998043 586200 618300 > 8169 [i]