Best Known (90, 90+54, s)-Nets in Base 8
(90, 90+54, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 144, 354)-net over F8, using
- 22 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (90, 166, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 83, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 83, 177)-net over F64, using
(90, 90+54, 514)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(90, 144, 514)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (54, 108, 514)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 54, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 54, 257)-net over F256, using
(90, 90+54, 851)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (90, 144, 851)-net over F8, using
(90, 90+54, 102262)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 144, 102263)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 11091 677556 143484 168670 399886 452226 070545 002726 111612 835528 819960 412754 786219 273194 080864 251251 870278 257238 446613 733467 265837 022416 > 8144 [i]