Best Known (128−55, 128, s)-Nets in Base 8
(128−55, 128, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (73, 128, 354)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (73, 132, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 177)-net over F64, using
(128−55, 128, 418)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (73, 128, 418)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 64, 209)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 209, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
(128−55, 128, 27600)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (73, 128, 27601)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (73, 127, 27601)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 4 929380 820983 972220 762418 759157 281203 627777 272986 365919 822917 871085 491383 544464 928128 939383 056301 609032 055956 826944 > 8127 [i]