Best Known (171−55, 171, s)-Nets in Base 8
(171−55, 171, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (116, 171, 1026)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (114, 171, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 172, 1026)-net over F8, using
(171−55, 171, 2196)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (116, 171, 2196)-net over F8, using
(171−55, 171, 757567)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (116, 171, 757568)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (116, 170, 757568)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3352 038434 792197 808077 750202 629168 874445 426186 920540 077390 896935 507265 859300 577522 420653 515781 465133 890731 629228 983921 747297 496033 827373 852669 717091 307069 > 8170 [i]