Best Known (144−56, 144, s)-Nets in Base 8
(144−56, 144, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (88, 144, 354)-net over F8, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (88, 162, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 81, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 81, 177)-net over F64, using
(144−56, 144, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(88, 144, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 72, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
(144−56, 144, 709)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (88, 144, 709)-net over F8, using
(144−56, 144, 71164)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (88, 144, 71165)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 11093 145307 600373 060964 882965 879406 512084 678438 802042 505922 054971 120341 400080 667883 174957 421102 366743 856935 217840 928394 707002 459855 > 8144 [i]