Best Known (132−57, 132, s)-Nets in Base 8
(132−57, 132, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (75, 132, 354)-net over F8, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (75, 136, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 68, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 68, 177)-net over F64, using
(132−57, 132, 418)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (75, 132, 418)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 66, 209)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 209, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
(132−57, 132, 27089)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (75, 132, 27090)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (75, 131, 27090)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 20188 674118 331599 049696 968522 010875 586634 159319 831439 992136 353446 239730 471619 222268 759280 138213 042515 508925 663439 383824 > 8131 [i]