Best Known (85, 85+61, s)-Nets in Base 8
(85, 85+61, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (85, 146, 354)-net over F8, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 156, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 78, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 78, 177)-net over F64, using
(85, 85+61, 514)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (85, 146, 514)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (12, 73, 257)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
(85, 85+61, 39849)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (85, 146, 39850)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (85, 145, 39850)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 88770 873334 534227 822902 036488 053895 612754 320818 118311 536371 662345 746366 138678 257879 738507 734080 957379 501522 576831 770672 459494 722064 > 8145 [i]