Best Known (158−62, 158, s)-Nets in Base 8
(158−62, 158, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 158, 354)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (93, 158, 354)-net over F8, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 86, 177)-net over F64, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (93, 172, 354)-net over F8, using
(158−62, 158, 432)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(96, 158, 432)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 79, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 72, 216)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (17, 84, 216)-net in base 64, using
(158−62, 158, 732)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (96, 158, 732)-net over F8, using
(158−62, 158, 71066)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 158, 71067)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 48798 303588 378075 991234 834924 921412 325513 525537 866876 571730 554824 629825 382574 831586 290630 016475 633848 889579 802457 904791 717306 657113 244096 440960 > 8158 [i]